site stats

Hirani v kassam

WebIn Hirani v. Kassam (1952), 19EACA 131, this Court with approval quoted the following passage from Seton on Judgments and Orders, 7 th edition, Vol.1 p.124 as follows: WebOn 3rd August 1990 a new counsel for the appellant, namely A G N Kamau, advocate, came into the scene and filed an application by Chamber Summons dated 4th July 1990 …

Civil Application 1 of 2015 - Kenya Law

http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/7824/ WebIt was set out by Windham J, as he then was, and approved by the Court of Appeal for East Africa, in Hirani v Kassam (1952) 19 EACA 131, at 134, as follows: “The mode of paying … hipus e-sourcing https://tfcconstruction.net

SPN(chapter 40) (89).pdf - 372 Kenya Law Reports [1985] KLR...

WebFresh pleadings would be required setting out the allegation of fraud, mistake or non-disclosure and seeking the set aside of the order by way of relief and the matter would proceed to a trial of the allegations. However in Hirani v. Kassam [1952] EA 131, followed in Attorney General and another v. WebIt can only be set aside for a reason which would enable the Court to set aside or rescind an agreement — see the celebrated case of Hirani v Kassam (1952) 19 ACA 131, In that … WebThat decision merely followedHirani v Kassam[1952] 19 EACA 131. The affidavits in this case, ordered by the previous court, illustrate thefutility of attempting to arbitrate at this stage between the rival claims. The parties are therefore left to their well-known remedies, and the appealmust fail. hip use

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH …

Category:THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA - Ulii

Tags:Hirani v kassam

Hirani v kassam

Civil Appeal 81 of 1984 - Kenya Law

http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/113949/ WebJun 1, 2024 · See Hirani v Kassam (1952) 19 EACA 131. The said Consent settlement was set aside ex parte implying that the applicants were not heard and therefore their …

Hirani v kassam

Did you know?

WebThe circumstances in which a Consent Judgment may be interfered with were considered in Hirani V Kassam [1952] 19 EACA where the following passage from Seton of Judgment and Orders, 7th Edition Volume 1 page 124 was approved: http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/117503/

WebOct 15, 2015 · It was held in Hirani V Kassam (1952) 19 EACA 131 that:- ... The plaint in HCCS 015/2013 Brian Asiimwe V Margret Tumwine Tumushabe, however shows that the plaintiff’s (respondent in this case) claim against the defendant (1 st applicant in this case) was for, among other things, an order for the revocation/cancellation of a grant of letters ... WebThat decision merely followed Hirani v Kassam [1952] 19 EACA 131. The affidavits in this case, ordered by the previous court, illustrate the futility of attempting to arbitrate at this stage between the rival claims. The parties are therefore left to their well-known remedies, and the appeal must fail.

WebNov 19, 2024 · Parker v Chief Constable of the Hampshire Constabulary: CA 25 Jun 1999. Christofi v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 28 Jun 1999. Demite Limited v Protec Health Limited; … WebThe law governing review and setting aside consent judgments was well articulated in the case of Ken Group of Companies Ltd. v. Standard Chartered Bank & 2 Others, H.C.M.A 116 of 2012 (Commercial Court) by Hon. Justice Madrama citing the case of Hirani v. Kassam 1952 E.A at 131 where the Court of Appeal held that;

WebFurther, the defendants argued, relying on Flora Wasike (supra) and Hirani V Kassam [1952] 19 ECA 131 page 137 that: “The mode of paying the debt then, is part of the consent judgment. That being so, the court cannot interfere with it except in such circumstances as would afford good ground for varying or rescinding a contract between the parties.”

WebOur Partners. Each year, government agencies, private foundations, corporations, and individuals join together with Aga Khan Foundation to support communities across Africa and Asia to build better futures together. Below, we highlight some of … homes for sale in ocean pines md zillowWebGordon Sentiba & OTHRS V IGG CACA NO. 14/ Hirani V Kassam [1952] EACA 133; Morris Ogwal & OTHRS V AG HCMA No/ Geoffrey Gateete & Anor. V William Kyobe SCCA No/ Meera Investments Ltd V Jeshang Popat Shah CACA No. 56 of 2003; Betuco (U) Ltd & Anor vs Barclays Bank (U) Ltd and Anor HCT -00-cc-MA -0507 – 2009 hipv25WebGordon Sentiba & OTHRS V IGG CACA NO. 14/ Hirani V Kassam [1952] EACA 133. Morris Ogwal & OTHRS V AG HCMA No/ Geoffrey Gateete & Anor. V William Kyobe SCCA No/ Meera Investments Ltd V Jeshang Popat Shah CACA No. 56 of 2003. Betuco (U) Ltd & Anor vs Barclays Bank (U) Ltd and Anor HCT -00-cc-MA -0507 2009. hipur woroldhomes for sale in ocean hills country club caWebSummary of the dispute. Claims arising out of the alleged unlawful expropriation and liquidation of a pharmaceuticals manufacturer, Pharm Industry including the alleged … hipus 日立 ediWebGordon Sentiba & OTHRS V IGG CACA NO. 14/ Hirani V Kassam [1952] EACA 133. Morris Ogwal & OTHRS V AG HCMA No/ Geoffrey Gateete & Anor. V William Kyobe SCCA No/ Meera Investments Ltd V Jeshang Popat Shah CACA No. 56 of 2003. Betuco (U) Ltd & Anor vs Barclays Bank (U) Ltd and Anor HCT -00-cc-MA -0507 2009. homes for sale in oceano ca 93445WebGordon Sentiba & OTHRS V IGG CACA NO. 14/2007 6. Hirani V Kassam [1952] EACA 133 7. Morris Ogwal & OTHRS V AG HCMA No.456/07 8. Geoffrey Gateete & Anor. V William Kyobe SCCA No.7/2005 9. Meera Investments Ltd V … homes for sale in ocean gate