Flatt v. superior court 1994 9 cal.4th 275
WebDec 21, 2005 · ( Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 283-284 [ 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 885 P.2d 950].) This case involves successive representation. The trial court determined Bradley entered into an attorney-client relationship with Howard and Mark when he met with Smith, who was acting as the agent of Howard and Mark, and Smith … WebFlatt's duty, if it [9 Cal. 4th 294] existed, was a duty to use the skill, prudence, and diligence commonly possessed by other attorneys, not a duty to advise Daniel about the statute of …
Flatt v. superior court 1994 9 cal.4th 275
Did you know?
WebAug 18, 2009 · Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 283 [ 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 885 P.2d 950] ( Flatt. )) In other words, if an attorney represents client X, then represents client Y, and X and Y have adverse interests, the attorney has a conflict of interest and is disqualified from representing Y if his previous representation of X is substantially related to ... Web364; Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 294 [an attorney owes a duty of care to his or her client of “‘conscientious fidelity’”]; Burgess v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th …
WebFeb 24, 2024 · Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275 (Flatt) and challenge the application of rule 1.7, which we address below), or the proposition that representation by Preovolos … WebFN 3. Thus, the facts here are distinguishable from those in Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal. 4th 275 [36 Cal. Rptr. 2d 537, 885 P.2d 950], upon which the majority mistakenly relies. There, the issue is the extent of a duty owed by an attorney to advise a new client seeking to sue an existing client of the attorney's firm.
Websought damages for legal malpractice against Flatt and her firm in the event that the court determined that the claims against Hinkle were barred by the statute of limitations. … WebJul 30, 2008 · Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 282-284, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 885 P.2d 950 (Flatt ).) In contrast, where the same attorney simultaneously represents potentially conflicting parties, the primary interest at stake is the attorney's duty of loyalty.
WebFlatt v. Superior Court 9 cal. 4th 275, 36 cal. rptr. 2d 537, 885 p.2d 950 (1994) Based on plaintiff William Daniel’s dissatisfaction with the work performed by his first attorney, …
WebFeb 11, 2024 · The Supreme Court famously articulated the doctrine of automatic “per se” disqualification for conflicted representation in Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275. The uncompromising language in Flatt has made it a controversial case among ethics lawyers for years. contact wave credit cardWebDec 28, 1994 · Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 282-283 & fn. 2, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 885 P.2d 950 (Flatt).) Conflicts typically implicate two of lawyers' most basic duties to … contact waterford upstartWebITT Small Business Finance Corp. v. Niles (1994) Citations: 36 Cal. Rptr. 2d 552, 885 P.2d 965, 9 Cal. 4th 245 efds topic 20WebFeb 24, 2024 · Thanasi cites no authority for these assertions (other than to distinguish Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275 (Flatt) and challenge the application of rule 1.7, which we address below), or the proposition that representation by Preovolos Lewin-a separate corporate entity with other individual attorney employees-is the same as … efd station 1WebMay 28, 2013 · An attorney bears two distinct ethical duties to a client: (1) a duty of loyalty, whereby an attorney devotes his or her “ ‘entire energies to his client's interests' ” (Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 289, italics omitted), and (2) a duty of confidentiality, “which fosters full and open communication between client and ... efd shippingWebSanta Clara University School of Law Digital Commons efd texas weatherWebFlatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275 [36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537].) A directly adverse conflict under paragraph (a) can arise in a number of ways, for example, when: (i) a lawyer … efds.nuctech.com/efds