Chng suan tze v minister of home affairs
WebAug 24, 2024 · By ‘the principle of legality’, Associate Professor Neo refers to the statement in Chng Suan Tze v Minister for Home Affairs [1988] SGCA 16, [1988] 2 SLR (R) 525 para 86 (‘ Chng Suan Tze ”’): ‘… the notion of a subjective or unfettered discretion is contrary to the rule of law. Chng Suan Tze v. Minister for Home Affairs is a seminal case in administrative law decided by the Court of Appeal of Singapore in 1988. The Court decided the appeal in the appellants' favour on a technical ground, but considered obiter dicta the reviewability of government power in preventive detention cases … See more Between May and June 1987, the appellants Chng Suan Tze, Kevin Desmond de Souza, Teo Soh Lung and Wong Souk Yee were arrested by the Internal Security Department (ISD) during Operation Spectrum for … See more The Chng Suan Tze decision is more notable for the issues that the Court of Appeal discussed obiter dicta, having already allowed the … See more The Court of Appeal's decision and the amendments to the Constitution and the ISA which followed have sparked much academic discourse. The following issues have been raised … See more • Official website of the Internal Security Department, Ministry of Home Affairs • Official website of the Supreme Court of Singapore See more The ratio decidendi, or legal point in the case which determined the judgment, was a narrow one. The appeals were allowed on the ground that … See more Following the Court of Appeal's decision in December 1988, the Singapore Government introduced bills into Parliament to amend the Constitution and the ISA to reverse the effect … See more Articles • Chua, Eunice (2007), "Reactions to Indefinite Preventive Detention: An Analysis of how the Singapore, United Kingdom and American Judiciary Give Voice to the Law in the Face of (Counter) Terrorism" See more
Chng suan tze v minister of home affairs
Did you know?
WebAug 13, 2024 · ^ a b Chng Suan Tze v. Minister for Home Affairs [1988] SGCA 16, [1988] 2 S.L.R.(R.) 525 at 563, para. 119, Court of Appeal (Singapore), archived from the original on 24 December 2011. ^ Attorney General v. Fulham Corporation [1921] 1 Ch. 440, High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (England & Wales). WebOct 3, 2012 · It argues that in the past the two narratives clashed over conceptions of the rule of law, but there is now evidence of convergence of thinking as regards the need to protect human rights, though...
WebTeh Cheng Poh V. Public Prosecutor [1979] 1 MLJ 50 ... Menteri Dalam Negeri, Malaysia [2009] 6 CLJ 705 Chng Suan Tze v. The Minister of Home Affairs & Ors and Other Appeals [1988] 1 LNS 162 Mohamad Ezam Bin Mohd Noor V Ketua Polis Negara & Other Appeals [2002] 4 MLJ 499, ... WebFeb 15, 2010 · The 2008 decision of Raja Petra bin Raja Kamarudin v Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negeri (‘‘RPK’’) however signifies a shift in judicial attitude and a reversal of the prioritisation of security over...
WebCiting Chng Suan Tze v. Minister for Home Affairs (1988), the High Court in Chan Hiang Leng Colin affirmed that disproportionality was not an independent ground of judicial review, and any issue of proportionality was subsumed under the ground of irrationality. Therefore, the Court gave no consideration to whether the publication ban was ... Webthree decades ago in Chng Suan Tze v Minister for Home Affairs and others and other appeals [1988] 2 SLR(R) 525 (“Chng Suan Tze”) at [86]: … [T]he notion of a subjective or unfettered discretion is contrary to the rule of law. All power has legal limits and the rule of law demands that the courts should be able to examine the
WebMar 22, 2024 · The now familiar passage in Chng Suan Tze v Minister for Home Affairs asserting that all power has legal limits has been declared to be a principle of legality that functions as a “basic principle” in constitutional and administrative judicial review. This article provides a close examination of case jurisprudence in Singapore to determine ... sheppard steering box seal replacementWebJan 22, 2015 · First, the decision in Chng Suan Tze v MHA was legislatively overruled by way of amendments made to the ISA and the Constitution. The effect of those amendments in ousting the jurisdiction of the courts was confirmed in the subsequent Court of Appeal decision of Teo Soh Lung v Minister for Home Affairs and others [1990] 1 SLR(R) 347. … springfield fair discount chemistWebA report on Chng Suan Tze v Minister for Home Affairs, Precedent fact errors in Singapore law and Procedural impropriety in Singapore administrative law sheppard steering box pitman arm removalWebChng Suan Tze v. Minister for Home Affairs is a seminal case in administrative law decided by the Court of Appeal of Singapore in 1988. The Court decided the appeal in … sheppard steering gear dealerWebJun 16, 2024 · In Chng Suan Tze v Minister for Home Affairs and others and other appeals [1988] 2 SLR (R) 525 (“ Chng Suan Tze ”) at [86]: … In our view, the notion of a subjective or unfettered discretion is contrary to the rule of law. sheppard steering gearboxWeb(2004) XXXIII No 1 I. Introdution The invocation of public interest litigation as a check against executive actions in Malaysia was severely clogged after 1988 by the case of Government of Malaysia v Lim Kit Siang.1This case marked the courts’ fundamental shift from a liberal to a restrictive approach in terms of the rules of standing which a … springfield fairgroundsWebAct, which allows the Minister of Home Affairs to order detention without trial to prevent a person from acting in a manner "prejudicial to the security of Singapore".I In 1989, a legislative amendment to the Constitution" made judicial review of the ISA on substantive grounds unavailable. This amendment followed Chng Suan Tze v. sheppards the vets health screening for dogs